Judge Judy Questions DA Bragg’s Priorities in High-Profile Legal Cases

Judge Judy Questions DA Bragg's Priorities in High-Profile Legal Cases

Judge Judy delivers a fiery critique of Manhattan’s DA, raising questions about justice priorities.

At a Glance

  • Judge Judy criticizes DA Alvin Bragg for his focus on Trump prosecution over local crime.
  • She questions the allocation of taxpayer funds towards Trump’s prosecution.
  • She suggests Bragg should address crimes impacting New Yorkers directly.
  • The criticism occurs as Bragg faces re-election, influencing voter sentiment.

Judge Judy’s Critique

During an interview on CNN, Judge Judy, widely known for her candid nature, launched a critique on DA Alvin Bragg’s approach to justice. She pointedly argued against his focus on prosecuting Donald Trump, specifically concerning payments to Stormy Daniels. Instead, Judge Judy suggested Bragg should tackle the local crimes affecting Manhattan’s citizens.

Judge Judy expressed her disapproval of the significant taxpayer money spent on the Trump case, which she characterized as convoluted and politically motivated. “I would be happier, as someone who owns property in Manhattan, if the district attorney of New York County would take care of criminals who were making it impossible for citizens to walk in the streets and use the subway,” she remarked. Her statement underscores the broader dissatisfaction among New Yorkers about the choices their DA is making.

Bragg’s Challenges and Election

Bragg is facing a re-election amid these criticisms and the broader dissatisfaction from citizens questioning his priorities. While crime continues to plague New York streets, the focus on high-profile political cases brings his decision-making into question. Judge Judy’s commentary might influence voter perspective, rendering them more critical of Bragg’s allocation of resources.

“I would be happier, as someone who owns property in Manhattan, if the district attorney of New York County would take care of criminals who were making it impossible for citizens to walk in the streets and use the subway, to use his efforts to keep those people off the street, than to spend $5 million or $10 million of taxpayers’ money trying Donald Trump on this nonsense,” Sheindlin said.” – Judge Judith Sheindlin – Source

Despite the criticisms, Bragg’s political trajectory remains optimistic as his fundraising efforts have increased since early 2025. However, the electorate remains divided as Judge Judy’s critique gains traction. Her remarks resonate with many, potentially swaying opinions in the lead-up to his re-election.

Impact on Public Opinion

Sheindlin’s comments illuminate the general frustrations with DA Alvin Bragg’s apparent priorities. New Yorkers are left to ponder where justice truly stands as political prosecutions take precedence over local safety. Her critique reflects a common sentiment that city officials should focus more on making streets safer and less on personal political agendas.

“You had to twist yourself into a pretzel to figure out what the crime was,” Sheindlin told Wallace. “[Bragg] doesn’t like him. New York City didn’t like him, for a while.” – Judge Judith Sheindlin

As we draw closer to the elections, Judge Judy’s forthright opinions will undoubtedly shape dialogues around the critical role district attorneys play in prioritizing the safety and livelihood of residents. With each passing day, New Yorkers are encouraged to reflect on their justice needs and vote accordingly.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR