Democratic Congressman Under Fire for Suggesting US Troops Be Banned from Fox News

Rep. Eric Swalwell, a well-known Democratic congressman, has recently come under fire for his hypocritical comments regarding Fox News. In a typical Democrat fashion, Swalwell attempted to use strong-arm tactics to prevent US troops from accessing a political perspective that differs from his own.


Swalwell recently criticized Fox News for spreading misinformation while also insisting that the network should “clean up” its evening line-up by removing Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham. These comments were made during an MSNBC interview where he was asked about the lawsuit between Dominion Voting Systems and Fox News. Host Katie Phang inquired if there should be Congressional intervention and action taken against the press network after news anchors questioned the fairness of the elections.

During the interview, MSNBC asked Swalwell if there were any discussions in Congress about possible interventions such as regulatory oversight and FCC involvement to prevent the spread of misinformation on news channels. While acknowledging the importance of the First Amendment, the news outlet inquired whether there should be some form of gatekeeping to ensure that such incidents do not occur again. It is worth noting that MSNBC has been accused of having communist leanings and a tendency to censor information that does not align with its political agenda.


Swalwell’s response to the question about possible interventions against Fox News was that the network should be banned from military bases despite its popularity with the armed forces. He acknowledged the importance of American television programming for the troops’ morale, but also expressed concern about a news station that is ruled by the court as spreading disinformation and misinformation during its evening hour. He went on to say that he may not disagree with VoteVets, who suggested reviewing how such news is being broadcast to the troops. Despite his acknowledgment of the importance of American news to the troops, Swalwell’s suggestion of censorship in this regard has drawn criticism and raised concerns about the protection of free speech.

Swalwell’s acknowledgement of the importance of American news to the US troops, along with his confirmation of Fox News’s popularity among them, is noteworthy. However, his subsequent suggestion of revoking the privilege of watching the top-rated cable news network has drawn criticism and sparked concerns about the protection of free speech. Some have even likened Swalwell’s stance to that of a Communist lawmaker. Given Swalwell’s previous association with a Chinese spy girlfriend, Fang-Fang, some have questioned the influence of such associations on his political views. Nonetheless, it is important to address the issue at hand and ensure that any proposed interventions do not violate upon the rights of the troops or violate the principles of free speech.

Russell Brand recently criticized MSNBC’s John Heilemann for condemning Fox News while failing to address the misleading narratives that have been aired on MSNBC. Brand highlighted MSNBC’s attack on Joe Rogan after he discussed the effectiveness of Ivermectin and noted that the news outlet pushed a false narrative that the medication was only intended for horses, despite evidence to the contrary. Brand called for a focus on improving the quality of journalism within news organizations rather than engaging in pointless arguments over which network is worse. He emphasized that such bickering does not contribute to saving American lives or improving the lives of American children, nor does it enhance America’s standing in the world. As a strong and influential nation, America has a duty to prioritize its commitment to the truth and the well-being of its citizens.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR