A Delaware judge has nullified Elon Musk’s $56 billion compensation package from Tesla, the electric car company he owns, as per court documents.
BREAKING – UNDER ATTACK: A judge in President Biden’s home state of Delaware just rejected Elon Musk's $56 billion Tesla compensation plan, claiming it was unfair.
NOTE: The setback lowers Musk's ranking to the third richest person globally, impacting his wealth and influence. pic.twitter.com/BH2FUVGNMv
— Simon Ateba (@simonateba) January 30, 2024
Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick’s surprising verdict on Tuesday asserted that Tesla’s board of directors failed to justify the compensation plan, despite its direct link to Musk’s performance as CEO. Musk, deeply involved in formulating the plan, had personal connections with the negotiators, influencing the judge’s decision.
“The concept of fairness calls for a holistic analysis that takes into consideration two basic issues: process and price,” the judge wrote. “The process leading to the approval of Musk’s compensation plan was deeply flawed. Musk had extensive ties with the persons tasked with negotiating on Tesla’s behalf.”
Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 30, 2024
The judge highlighted decades-long personal and professional relationships, citing an example of a former divorce attorney moved to tears by his admiration for Musk. She also argued that Tesla shareholders voting for the package were uninformed due to inaccuracies and omissions in the proxy statement.
“The price was no better,” she added, emphasizing that the compensation plan was 30 times larger than Musk’s previous pay package.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 31, 2024
Musk criticized the ruling on X (formerly Twitter), advising against incorporating in Delaware and recommending Nevada or Texas for shareholder decision-making.
Delaware, historically business-friendly, has shifted toward far-left policies that may deter profit. Musk shared an op-ed noting that Delaware’s embrace of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles might jeopardize its corporate appeal.
The Delaware Chancery Court’s decision to strike down Tesla’s deal with Elon is a threat to the future of capitalism. Courts shouldn’t second-guess the *business judgments* of boards to maximize shareholder value. Yet that’s exactly what Tesla’s board did here – successfully. pic.twitter.com/aU6DOOjfrl
— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) January 31, 2024
Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy considers the decision a threat to capitalism, asserting that courts should not second-guess boards’ business judgments.
Since Elon Musk Bought 𝕏:
-SEC sues Musk over the purchase
-FTC demands internal 𝕏 documents
-Biden DOJ sues SpaceX for not hiring refugees for secret rocket technology
-Biden DOJ and SEC open investigations against Tesla over a literal glass house
-Biden DOJ opens criminal… pic.twitter.com/L6va2tmdka— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) December 6, 2023
This legal battle is part of a series Musk faces post his Twitter acquisition, removing federal influence from the platform.